Seraph: Spring of the Enhanced Capacitor wrong soak

Forum where closed and resolved bug reports live
Post Reply
User avatar
Meric
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2021 2:47 am

Seraph: Spring of the Enhanced Capacitor wrong soak

Post by Meric »

Hellos,

As below. Thane (id=4633) has DI and Spring of the Enhanced Capacitor as such his unholy soak should be at least 4 with 40MO. After buying Spring of the Enhanced Capacitor today his soak did not increase for unholy at all.
Attachments
Thane.jpg
Thane.jpg (15.18 KiB) Viewed 1760 times
Sunset Shimmer attacked you with a Frozen Gauntlet and hit for 62 points of holy damage. She was hiding! This attack was charged with righteous wrath! Their body strained with holy resolve as they added physical power to this attack! (2021-11-22)
User avatar
Meric
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2021 2:47 am

Re: Seraph: Spring of the Enhanced Capacitor wrong soak

Post by Meric »

Actually it should be 5 unholy soak if they all stack

Divine Investiture is +2
Divine Armor is +0
Corpus Machina is +1
Spring of the Enhanced Capacitor is +2


The overall soak with all 4 skills, if they stack, would be:
Slashing 8
Piercing 8
Impact 8
Fire 7
Cold 7
Electric 7
Acid 6
Death 7
Holy 9
Unholy 5
Arcane 7

It all appears correct except Unholy. It looks like the +1 soak from Corpus Machina isnt applying either
Sunset Shimmer attacked you with a Frozen Gauntlet and hit for 62 points of holy damage. She was hiding! This attack was charged with righteous wrath! Their body strained with holy resolve as they added physical power to this attack! (2021-11-22)
User avatar
Nayru
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:27 am
Location: 0,0

Re: Seraph: Spring of the Enhanced Capacitor wrong soak

Post by Nayru »

i was screwing with all the weirdo paladin/seraph soak mechanics in code for like 2.5 hours this morning

i believe i have fixed every issue present with them

including the ones people didn't know about but apparently existed

even briefly started turning into gollum somewhere in there, but regardless, probably fixed
da52f6211f69d11f5c8e839b28ba7fd5.png
da52f6211f69d11f5c8e839b28ba7fd5.png (6.29 KiB) Viewed 1697 times
- You say, "Oh my me." (2022-01-30 03:41:07).
Post Reply